Nick Licata on Reading, Writing, Arithmetic and Arts

This post from Seattle City Councilmember Nick Licata’s blog site responds to the discrepancy of funding for arts in education through the Families and Education Levy. It’s a good follow-up to my last post.

Posted on Nick Licata’s Urban Politics Blog: May 7th, 2012 under Arts and Culture, Education, Government

I recently came across this interesting article published by Studio 360 describing the Obama Administration’s $14.7 million Turnaround Arts Initiative. The initiative seeks to utilize arts education to improve eight of the nation’s worst performing schools over the next three years.

Back in 2008, I wrote about an arts education bill (UP #264) I was pursuing in our state legislature. The bill would have redirected lottery proceeds dedicated to paying baseball stadium bonds to a state-wide School Arts Program once the bonds were retired. The Washington State Arts Commission would have created a School Arts Program Committee and a competitive grant process to support arts-infused curriculum, programs, and projects in public schools. Unfortunately, over the three years it came up for a vote, it failed to pass.

Some of you may be wondering why I pursued that bill and why the Obama Administration is spending $14 million to inject the arts into education. For one, the arts are designated as a core subject area in Washington State schools, yet funding for arts instruction lags far behind that of other core subjects.

Our state’s schools may have made arts a core subject in part due to research such as a 1998 finding by Shirley Brice Heath of Stanford University, the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and Americans for the Arts. It found among other things that young people who regularly participate in the arts are four times more likely to be recognized for academic achievement.

But, I don’t believe test scores alone can determine a student’s success in life. “Stringent standardized testing requirements have forced schools and teachers to obsess over test scores at the cost of teaching critical thinking and creativity. The very nature of standardized testing is that new ideas are punished,” says Diane Ravitch in the Studio 360 article. She’s the author of The Life and Death of the Great American School System and served in the Department of Education in both the George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton administrations.

She adds “If we have a generation of kids who can’t think for themselves, our whole country is in trouble. Nations that have the highest test scores have the lowest creativity scores. The more we raise our test scores, the more we sacrifice creativity.”

The solution, Ravitch believes, is not more federal dollars. Support needs to come from local and state government, which must consider music and visual arts as valuable as reading and math, that the arts are just as important in schools as are basic subjects — that art actually is a basic subject.

We are fortunate that in Seattle schools, the arts are a basic subject. However, among the applicants for Families and Education Levy (FEL) 2012-2013 funding, no arts educators qualified. The City’s Office for Education (OFE) has now pledged to reach out to those who didn’t qualify through a series of workshops intended to produce qualifying applicants for 2013-2014 funding.

OFE will  hold four workshops: a full day on Monday, June 25th; a half day on Tuesday, June 26th; a full day on Wednesday, August 1st; and a half day on Thursday, August 2nd. For the June 26th & August 2nd workshops, OFE staff will meet with any arts education group requesting a one-on-one consultation. The workshops will present the Seattle School District’s general educational data and describe how FEL uses that data. School District staff will also be on hand to answer questions and to provide one-on-one instruction. Details on the workshops have yet to be published, so keep an eye on OFE’s web site for information on the location and times.

3 responses to “Nick Licata on Reading, Writing, Arithmetic and Arts

  1. How ironic. There must be some belief that arts organizations that did not get funded are quite worthy of being funded, they just didn’t “pass the test”. OFE is now “teaching to the test” to increase these same arts organizations chances of being funded the next year. While the support is great, doesn’t that make one wonder about the grant process in the same way we wonder about standarized test? Makes my head spin a bit!

  2. Awesome blog! Do you have any hints for aspiring writers?
    I’m hoping to start my own website soon but I’m a little lost on everything.
    Would you advise starting with a free platform like WordPress or
    go for a paid option? There are so many choices out there that I’m
    completely confused .. Any tips? Bless you!

    • Thanks! WordPress is a great place to start. There are plenty of theme designs to choose from that are free. It’s easy to use. Just give yourself a couple of weeks to play around to get used to it. Good luck!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s